Serveur d'exploration SRAS

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning

Identifieur interne : 000066 ( Psycho/Analysis ); précédent : 000065; suivant : 000067

The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning

Auteurs : Omar Lizardo [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:7AD80AEBABCD5DB6910E17ECD32EEBC719ED4CBC

English descriptors

Abstract

In this paper I propose a new understanding of the often-noted phenomenon that much of our conceptualization and reasoning about moral propriety is framed by a set of metaphors that originate from a conceptual structure generated from our experiences with dirt and cleanliness. I argue that reliance on the dirty-clean dichotomy to conceptualize moral propriety or impropriety emerges from metaphorical extensions into various realms of experience (e.g., sports, governance, introspection) grounded in an idealized cognitive model in which dirt is conceptualized as matter out of place and clean is conceptualized as ordered arrangement. The analysis provides a unified framework with which to understand the use of dirty and clean as metaphors to categorize objects, events and actions in the moral domain. Finally, I suggest that the dirty-clean distinction is useful for understanding broader cultural issues (such as moral panics regarding media, immigration and disease), and I show that the conceptualization of certain non-moral properties can be understood using the same framework (e.g., the quality of being exceptional) of objects and actions.

Url:
DOI: 10.1515/cog-2012-0011


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

ISTEX:7AD80AEBABCD5DB6910E17ECD32EEBC719ED4CBC

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Lizardo, Omar" sort="Lizardo, Omar" uniqKey="Lizardo O" first="Omar" last="Lizardo">Omar Lizardo</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:7AD80AEBABCD5DB6910E17ECD32EEBC719ED4CBC</idno>
<date when="2012" year="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1515/cog-2012-0011</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/QT4-6MXGRR7D-M/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001865</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001865</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001865</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000515</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000515</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0936-5907:2012:Lizardo O:the:conceptual:bases</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">001E29</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">001E05</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">001E05</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Psycho/Extraction">000066</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning</title>
<author wicri:is="90%">
<name sortKey="Lizardo, Omar" sort="Lizardo, Omar" uniqKey="Lizardo O" first="Omar" last="Lizardo">Omar Lizardo</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country wicri:rule="url">États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="abbrev">Cognitive Linguistics</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1613-3641</idno>
<idno type="ISSN">0936-5907</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>De Gruyter Mouton</publisher>
<date type="published">2012</date>
<date type="e-published">2012</date>
<biblScope unit="vol">23</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="367">367</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="393">393</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0936-5907</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0936-5907</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Abstract domains</term>
<term>Abstract notions</term>
<term>Abstract pathogenicity</term>
<term>Abstract rules</term>
<term>Analysis accounts</term>
<term>Anonymous reader</term>
<term>Anthropologist mary douglas</term>
<term>Bodily substances</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Categorization</term>
<term>Certain actions</term>
<term>Certain entities</term>
<term>Certain objects</term>
<term>Chicago press</term>
<term>Clean tour</term>
<term>Cleanliness</term>
<term>Cleanliness metaphors</term>
<term>Cognitive</term>
<term>Cognitive grammar</term>
<term>Cognitive linguistics</term>
<term>Cognitive models</term>
<term>Competitive sports</term>
<term>Component parts</term>
<term>Conceptual</term>
<term>Conceptual metaphor</term>
<term>Conceptual metaphors</term>
<term>Conceptual structure</term>
<term>Conceptualization</term>
<term>Conceptualize</term>
<term>Conceptualized</term>
<term>Concrete settings</term>
<term>Container metaphor</term>
<term>Cultural studies</term>
<term>Daniel defoe</term>
<term>Direct contact</term>
<term>Dirt</term>
<term>Dirt metaphors</term>
<term>Dirty</term>
<term>Dirty bomb</term>
<term>Dirty lawyer</term>
<term>Dirty mind</term>
<term>Dirty person</term>
<term>Dirty player</term>
<term>Dirty politician</term>
<term>Dirty politics</term>
<term>Dirty settings</term>
<term>Dirty thoughts</term>
<term>Dirtying</term>
<term>Discourse samples</term>
<term>English words</term>
<term>Entire team</term>
<term>Extraneous elements</term>
<term>Family name</term>
<term>Filth</term>
<term>Foreign object</term>
<term>Foreign substance</term>
<term>George mark johnson</term>
<term>Human agent</term>
<term>Icms</term>
<term>Illicit substance</term>
<term>Jonathan haidt</term>
<term>Lakoff</term>
<term>Lebron james</term>
<term>Lizardo</term>
<term>Marion jones</term>
<term>Mary douglas</term>
<term>Media content</term>
<term>Media filth</term>
<term>Metaphor</term>
<term>Metaphorical</term>
<term>Metaphorical constructions</term>
<term>Metaphorical extensions</term>
<term>Moral categorization</term>
<term>Moral cognition</term>
<term>Moral metaphor system</term>
<term>Moral order</term>
<term>Moral panics</term>
<term>Moral propriety</term>
<term>Moral purity</term>
<term>Moral realm</term>
<term>Moral reasoning</term>
<term>Moral status</term>
<term>Neutral entity</term>
<term>Objectionable content</term>
<term>Permanent contact</term>
<term>Primary experience</term>
<term>Primary metaphors</term>
<term>Primary scenes</term>
<term>Prototypical</term>
<term>Prototypical case</term>
<term>Prototypical event</term>
<term>Public airwaves</term>
<term>Same analysis</term>
<term>Seattle post intelligencer</term>
<term>Sinful thoughts</term>
<term>Social psychology bulletin</term>
<term>Source domain</term>
<term>Stanford university press</term>
<term>Sumio imada</term>
<term>Wide range</term>
<term>Wide variety</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this paper I propose a new understanding of the often-noted phenomenon that much of our conceptualization and reasoning about moral propriety is framed by a set of metaphors that originate from a conceptual structure generated from our experiences with dirt and cleanliness. I argue that reliance on the dirty-clean dichotomy to conceptualize moral propriety or impropriety emerges from metaphorical extensions into various realms of experience (e.g., sports, governance, introspection) grounded in an idealized cognitive model in which dirt is conceptualized as matter out of place and clean is conceptualized as ordered arrangement. The analysis provides a unified framework with which to understand the use of dirty and clean as metaphors to categorize objects, events and actions in the moral domain. Finally, I suggest that the dirty-clean distinction is useful for understanding broader cultural issues (such as moral panics regarding media, immigration and disease), and I show that the conceptualization of certain non-moral properties can be understood using the same framework (e.g., the quality of being exceptional) of objects and actions.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Lizardo, Omar" sort="Lizardo, Omar" uniqKey="Lizardo O" first="Omar" last="Lizardo">Omar Lizardo</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SrasV1/Data/Psycho/Analysis
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000066 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Psycho/Analysis/biblio.hfd -nk 000066 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SrasV1
   |flux=    Psycho
   |étape=   Analysis
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:7AD80AEBABCD5DB6910E17ECD32EEBC719ED4CBC
   |texte=   The conceptual bases of metaphors of dirt and cleanliness in moral and non-moral reasoning
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Tue Apr 28 14:49:16 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 22:06:49 2021